15 49.0138 8.38624 1 0 4000 1 https://www.audemarsreviews.com 300 true 0
theme-sticky-logo-alt
Patek Philippe Nautilus 5711/1A-010 Watch Review

Patek Philippe Nautilus 5711/1A-010 Watch Review

The reason of my survey of the acclaimed Patek Philippe Nautilus 5711 “Blue” watch (reference 5711/1A-010) centers around one straightforward inquiry: “What makes this steel sports way of life watch, with the entirety of its extra layers, tenaciously in high demand?” To additionally represent my point, just before the distribution of this audit, Patek Philippe chose to raise the cost of this watch by 20%. In spite of the fact that I’ve consistently held an incredible regard for the Patek Philippe Nautilus, I’ve never wanted to claim one. On one hand, I have incredible adoration for crafted by the late Gerald Genta, who planned this genuine Patek Philippe exemplary during the 1970s. Also, I’m an aficionado of watches on tightening wristbands just as exact, very much made developments. Then again, despite the fact that I regard Patek Philippe’s watchmaking make more than that of Audemars Piguet, Gerald Genta’s other work of art, the Royal Oak, is an additionally fitting watch for my “edgy” tastes. In some sense, the two watches are two felines from a similar litter, with Audemars Piguet picking the more feisty little cat and Patek Philippe getting the smooth-haired youthful one. You can’t authoritatively state that one is in a way that is better than the other—despite the fact that I’m sure most, if not all, would concur that Patek Philippe has the predominant movement.

Given the position of safety presence of the Nautilus on the wrist, in any case, it has never been some tea. I will in general like somewhat more self-assured plans a touch more, and the side flanks of the Nautilus never truly developed on me. All things considered, I was extremely dazzled with my keep going active involvement in a 5711-style Nautilus, the  Patek Philippe Nautilus 5711/1P , the twentieth commemoration strong platinum release with precious stone hour markers. This model, in actuality, is a steel watch that (once in the past) retails at just shy of $25,000 USD, yet is frequently found at considerably greater expenses, also the shortlist. It’s harder to get than a fired Daytona, and nobody is actually very ready to sort out why. Regardless, the 5711 in blue is a hot extravagance commodity, so even used renditions are effectively ready to sell at retail price.


Could this all be important for the “Genta effect?” Is the sorcery of Gerald Genta’s plans filling this interest for this top of the line watch past its foreseen life expectancy? The late watch planner is most likely more well known today than during his lifetime, and however I don’t feel that I’ve deciphered the code of what makes a large number of his plans so intriguing, yet I do believe that this Nautilus encouraged me begin assembling the pieces. One thing is without a doubt—the renowned standing of these plans wouldn’t be conceivable without Patek Philippe being a quality watchmaker.

What was Patek Philippe expecting to accomplish with the Nautilus? At the point when it was presented in 1976, it should be an oceanic way of life extravagance watch for affluent men and their relatives who invested energy sailing or living by the ocean. Genta pulled in plan signs, for example, boat openings for the plan of the bezel and flanks, and the flat lines on the dial are intended to look like teak wood boat decks. Not exclusively was the obviously differentiating brushed and cleaned completing looking into the issue common practice for different watches delivered at that point, however it was likewise reminiscent of the metal equipment of a yacht deck.

I accept that single direction to like the genuine ability of Gerald Genta is to see him as an expert arm band fashioner. He appeared to realize how to mix an exquisite and clear dial with the ideal wristband. At the time Genta got associated with plan, item plan for watches was similarly as huge as item plan of, for example, autos. Everybody had them and utilized them, so in light of the wide assortment of these things, individuals were really inspired by remarkable plans. Subsequently, Genta was planning something that would be both worn and seen by everybody. For this situation, individuals wearing those watches were the rich tip top that comprised Patek Philippe’s customer base during the 1970s, and it’s a similar segment, yet in bigger numbers, that actually wear Patek Philippe today.


My end is that the Patek Philippe Nautilus is a phenomenal illustration of a men’s wristband adornments that just so ends up having a watch connected to it. The steel development of the case and arm band keeps it from being excessively vainglorious too. Not exclusively does an exceptionally regarded watchmaker give the plan the completing and development it merits, however it additionally outfits the watch with the best non-complicated mechanical developments. In contrast to Rolex, the development isn’t taken cover behind a strong caseback. Or maybe, Patek Philippe needs Nautilus proprietors to swagger and flaunt that sparkly in-house made type 324 S C through the sapphire precious stone caseback.

The development is a fine illustration of what you should search for in a basic yet very good quality games watch. What makes the type 324 S C amazing past its significant level of completing is its flimsy profile. The development is simply 3.3mm thick, and taking all things together, the Nautilus keeps a water obstruction of 120m regardless of being simply 8.3mm thick. The programmed rotor is in strong 21k gold, which really implies it gauges enough to keep the winding effectiveness high. The development works at 4Hz (28,800 bph) with 45 hours of intensity save, and it likewise includes Patek Philippe’s in-house Gyromax balance haggle balance spring. I would state execution is likely on par or inside a decent edge of Rolex’s “Superlative Chronometers.” Finishing, however, is an alternate story—Patek Philippe showers the surfaces with Cotes de Geneve stripes and little, exquisite areas of perlage, with the last being my number one component of the movement.

There are as yet minor contrasts between the completing of the type 324 S with a development on a watch in the $100,000+ territory. The slanted edges, for example, are extremely thin, and I’d love for them to be more extensive and more hand-wrapped up. It would simply cause the development to feel a lot more important. I’m being careful with the development in light of the fact that despite the fact that it looks and performs incredibly, this is a steel watch that costs $25,000. My assumptions, and shopper assumptions in general, are accordingly somewhat higher at this cost range.

Patek Philippe’s most grounded motivation to back the precarious expense of the Nautilus is the number of steps it takes to fabricate and clean the case and arm band. The cycle burns-through a ton of time, utilizes various kinds of extraordinarily prepared workers, and is extremely hard to complete without botches. Watch wristband making is an esteemed however scant workmanship—and Patek Philippe (alongside any semblance of Rolex and Audemars Piguet) is among the couple of keeping it alive. Alive, yet not really advancing. As I would see it, the Nautilus is an entirely made, present day sports watch for folks who are similarly far-fetched to wear their watch into the water today as they were before. Patek Philippe has kept up a similar Nautilus model, while proceeding to make it a more proficient and dependable watch. As it were, there is no genuine 21st century Nautilus, and I’m not certain there ever will be. Notwithstanding quite a bit of its previous innovative brilliance, Patek Philippe today is an incredibly moderate brand. I couldn’t imagine anything better than to see a Nautilus 2.0 (so to state) that ships the idea of an extravagance sports way of life watch into the advanced period. It would be of Patek Philippe quality, however it would be more agent of contemporary qualities and style. Could that occur? Could that occur? On the off chance that Patek Philippe decides to take on that project, they could make something very cool.

As it stands, the Patek Philippe Nautilus 5711 is a warm and welcoming oldie but a goodie for the individuals who feel that something suggestive of the 1970s merits a spot on their extravagance watch chain of command. By all agreements, the Patek Philippe Nautilus is a fine watch (however Genta’s “wall clock inspired” dials can here and there quiet me to rest). The genuine inquiry individuals need to pose to themselves is, “Does it address me?” It’s OK on the off chance that it doesn’t, yet for some watch authorities, the Nautilus has spoken uproarious and clear to them.

I re-visitation of whether Patek Philippe needs to charge nearly $25,000 for the Nautilus. What’s more, how would they appear to be going at retail or greater expenses on the open market? Retailers of Patek Philippe watches guarantee they get scarcely any of these watches from the brand, which, assuming valid, shows that Patek Philippe is either deliberately attempting to convey as not many 5711s as could be expected under the circumstances, or something really keeps them from delivering more than they do now. The appropriate response isn’t quickly clear, however I can say that the time spent to create every Nautilus watch isn’t simply in the development, yet additionally generally in the case.


Compared to different watches that simply have a case, the Nautilus has a full wristband. That implies there are a ton of extra parts that should be built, completed, checked, and collected. In this manner, the creation season of a watch with a complicated arm band, for example, that of the Nautilus can undoubtedly be twofold the creation season of a watch without one. Moreover, Patek Philippe likely doesn’t have a huge mechanical focus delivering wristbands, so the amount of Nautilus watches is essentially restricted by creation limit given the many fluctuated parts.

The beneath data is found on Patek Philippe’s own site (despite the fact that it isn’t too simple to even think about finding), and I think it well-outlines the complexity of the Nautilus case and arm band creation and completing process:

“[The Nautilus is] additionally ideal to delineate case and wristband hand-completing – and specifically, cleaning strategies. The cleaning alone incorporates machine sandblasting, lapping/emerizing, felt cleaning, glossy silk brushing, and cleaning and buffing.

After machining, it takes around 55 diverse hand-completing activities to complete the Nautilus case and arm band. It starts with setting up the outside connections individually: emerizing on the underside and silk brushing on top. At that point setting up the middle connections individually: emerizing on the underside, reflect cleaning on top. Next is the gathering of the wristband: fitting the connections together and driving in the pins.


Chamfering, which means removing sharp edges, is then performed on the underside and top of the arm band. The underside and top are then silk brushed for a uniform surface. Next is covering – securing the encompassing territory in front of the following activity with polish or tape, and connecting punctured concealing tape along the highest point of the wristband. At that point the middle connections and chamfer work are cleaned and polished. Next, the catch is gathered, adapted to pressure, fitted to the wristband, and the cover bolted (on a triple-edge fasten). A last investigation follows this.”

Patek Philippe says it quite well, and I think the takeaway is that the Nautilus is a truly complicated watch to build and amass. Is it $25,000 complicated? Patek Philippe says yes. Two current forms of the Nautilus 5711 are delivered today. The first is the angle blue dial (eference 5711/1A-010), and the second is the silver with dark markers (reference 5711/1A-011). The previous is the unfathomably more well known variation, while the last is ostensibly the more decipherable of the two. If I somehow managed to pick one, I’d go with the silver dial basically on the grounds that there is less demand.

Though not every person adores the date window on the Nautilus, I’ve never objected to it. I do concur that it adjusts dial evenness, yet for me, having the date is simply essential for the Nautilus bundle. Without it, I’d feel like the dial was missing something. The 5711/1A has a steel case and wristband, while the hands and hour markers (with luminant) are in 18k white gold. The luminant isn’t astounding, however it is certainly recognizable. The notorious “hot canine on a stick” style hands are exquisite to peruse the time with, however not actually manly in a contemporary style. The hands are exquisite, however there are other present day plans that exhibit strength, so to

A. Lange & Sohne Lange 1 Moon Phase Watch Review
Previous Post
A. Lange & Sohne Lange 1 Moon Phase Watch Review
Zelos Mako 500M Dive Watch Review
Next Post
Zelos Mako 500M Dive Watch Review