15 49.0138 8.38624 1 0 4000 1 https://www.audemarsreviews.com 300 true 0
HODINKEE Radio Twenty-Teens Watch Collection Fantasy Draft

Radio Twenty-Teens Watch Collection Fantasy Draft

Subscribe to the show: ( Apple Podcast s, Stitcher , Spotify , TuneIn ). Effectively heard it on more than one occasion? Kindly leave a short audit, and disclose to us which visitors we ought to have on!

watch@audemarsreviews.com .com

We needed to commence 2021 with a blast, and with regards to HODINKEE Radio that implies a dream draft. Since we just entered another decade, it appeared as great a period as any to glance back at the most recent 10 years and a portion of our #1 watches from the time frame. The watch world is a completely extraordinary universe to what it was in 2011, and notwithstanding the actual watches, this is an incredible chance to glance back at our interest, the business that underpins it, and the community that has developed around it. Yet, don’t stress, there are a lot of watches as well. This is the authority HODINKEE Radio Twenty-Teens Watch Collection Fantasy Draft.

This go-around, the guidelines are basic. Members could pick any watch delivered between 2011-2020, there were no spending plans, and we chose to be liberal about what considered copies so we didn’t confine anybody. Every assortment is five watches, with the picks filling the accompanying classifications: Sport Watch, Dress Watch, Complication (more than time and date), Budget (under $1,000 at season of delivery), and Wildcard (anything goes). We did our standard snake design draft to keep things reasonable. You know the drill.

The assortments that came about are incredibly intriguing. There are some evident elite player watches in the blend, a couple of very clear exclusions, and more than one questionable choice. Keep in mind, we’re summarizing a time of horological history here in only 20 picks. Its absolutely impossible that all the fantastic watches from the most recent 10 years could be picked, so kindly don’t pass judgment on us too cruelly on the off chance that we missed one of your top choices (however let us understand what watches you’d have picked in the comments). We will do an entire subsequent show wherein we uncover the champ, talk about what we’d do another way, take a gander at a portion of the watches that ought to have made the cut, and so forth Tell us in the comments if there are any inquiries you need us to address, and, obviously, make certain to decide on the victor below.

The Collections


Sport: Bulgari Octo Finissimo Automatic in Titanium (2017)
Dress: Cartier Maillon de Cartier  (2020)
Complication: Patek Philippe Ref. 5270P with Salmon Dial (2018)
Budget: Swatch Sistem51 HODINKEE Generation 1990 (2020)
Wildcard: Rolex Rainbow Daytona Ref. 116595 RBOW (2018)


Sport: Tudor Pelagos Blue (2015)
Dress: Grand Seiko SBGW252 (2017)
Complication: Patek Philippe Aquanaut Ref. 5164A (2011)
Budget: Halios Seaforth (2017)
Wildcard: Vacheron Constantin Overseas Dual Time Prototype (2019) 


Sport: Tudor Black Bay Burgundy (2012)
Dress: Credor Eichi II in Rose Gold (2018)
Complication: Vacheron Constantin Les Cabinotiers Celestia (2017)
Budget: Q Timex (2019)
Wildcard: Rolex Daytona Ref. 116500LN (2016)


Sport: Rolex GMT-Master II Ref. 126710 BLRO (2018)

Dress: Akrivia Chronomètre Contemporain (2018)

Comp: A. Lange & Söhne Lange 1 Tourbillon Handswerkskunst (2014)

Financial plan: Hamilton Khaki Field Mechanical (2018)

Trump card: Audemars Piguet Royal Oak ‘Large’ Ref. 15202ST (2012)

You Pick The Winner

Show Notes

(11:20) Eric Ku’s Rainbow Datejust

(40:00) HODINKEE Radio, Episode 21: Matt Jacobson 

(43:00) The Vacheron Constantin 57260

(49:45) The Halios Seaforth

(56:30) The Gray NATO Episode 85: A Chat With Adventurer Cory Richards

The World Needs More Diverse Watchmakers
Previous Post
The World Needs More Diverse Watchmakers
Sunday Rewind Patek Philippe's Iconic Ad Campaign
Next Post
Sunday Rewind Patek Philippe’s Iconic Ad Campaign